QFI - News

Report: Queensland's Power Puzzle 2025

Written by | Dec 5, 2025 5:41:47 AM

 

The 2025 Queensland Futures Institute Queensland’s Power Puzzle panel highlighted both the  challenges and opportunities of Queensland’s energy transition, centring on the new Queensland Energy Roadmap as the key policy driver. The transition will hinge on transmission delivery (notably the Central Queensland-Gladstone reinforcement), pragmatic firming from gas and coordinated action across Government, GOCs, Powerlink and private investors, alongside clearer market signals, streamlined regulation and workforce capability.

 

 

 

JACQUI BRIDGE
Executive General Manager
Network Investment
Powerlink

JOHN CARR
Project CEO,
Capricornia Pumped Hydro

DAN CLARK
Chief Executive Officer,
Australia Pacific LNG

 

   

JAMES HARMAN
Chief Executive Officer
EDL

MODERATOR: 
CARA GRAHAM
Partner, Energy
Strategy and Transactions
EY

   
 
 SUMMARY OF PANEL COMMENTS
 
  • New transmission and infrastructure build needed for the transition will be spread across regions – successful
    delivery will require meaningful community engagement (including First Nations leadership) and clear planning
    and coordination.
  • There will be a pragmatic need for gas to firm renewables – with generation expected to rise from 3.5GW
    to 8 GW within a decade, and peak gas demand from 300 TJ/day to 1 PJ/day. This will require planning and
    coordination across government and industry to deliver the necessary market settings needed to underpin
    this infrastructure.
  • With ~75% of east-coast gas exported and ad-hoc interventions deterring investment, a policy reset on
    gas is needed to restore certainty. Export permits with domestic-first obligations could achieve this.
  • Rapidly shifting targets and incompressible delivery timelines are the dominant investment risks of the
    transition.
  • There are opportunities to build energy infrastructure near load – at the fringe-of-grid or off-grid – to produce
    power close to demand, particularly in the North West Mineral Province. This will reduce the demand for major
    transmission and improve reliability. The $200 million Northwest Energy Plan fund is welcome support to
    achieve this.
  • Regulations and multi-layered approvals have stretched transmission delivery timeframes.
  • Determining the value of reliability (e.g., when renewables aren’t available) is a critical market signal needed
    to inform the role for early-stage government co-investment (risk-sharing) to crowd in capital and support the
    necessary investment in the transition.
  • While fringe-of-grid and remote solutions are technically possible, these are not feasible in Queensland given
    the role of Ergon. Queensland should allow private providers to tender alongside Ergon for remote/fringe-ofgrid
    microgrid solutions to leverage private capital and expertise.
  • There is an opportunity to scale renewable gas (landfill/biogas) and mine waste gas, and to deploy modular
    hybrids near load.
  • Despite these opportunities, we must face the costs of the transition upfront in order to benefit from cheaper
    energy later as buildout matures.
PANEL COMMENTS
 
There’s been a lot of media around the importance of transmission in Australia’s energy transition.
How is Powerlink engaging with communities and winning hearts and minds of stakeholders for the
large projects that you are delivering?
 
   



Jacqui Bridge

  • Much of the transmission, new generation and storage infrastructure will be distributed
    across regions in Queensland.
  • Host communities are critical to delivering this infrastructure – so it is critical to develop
    these projects in collaboration with community.
  • There is a clear need to effectively engage with community and be very transparent as we develop projects and leverage community input throughout their delivery.
  • In doing this, Powerlink has developed a range of frameworks and partnerships over
    recent years.
  • But expectations are continuously rising, and we’re running to keep up with the level of
    engagement and expectations.
  • We have a First Nations leadership group to assist with First Nations issues.
  • We work closely with the Energy Charter and have helped develop codes of conduct and
    engagement guidelines.
  • But there remains complexity and some confusion in communities about who the different parties are and what their engagement is about.
  • We need to make it easier for communities to understand this, and the broader industry
    must work together to improve transparency and coordinate community input.

The recent Queensland Energy Roadmap and National Electricity Market review have both indicated
that there is a role for natural gas to firm renewables. What do you think is needed to supply the
growing demand for gas to firm renewable energy both here and overseas?





 

Dan Clark

  • First, I see the Queensland Energy Roadmap as a very pragmatic, reasonable and logical
    plan which recognises the key role gas will play in the transition.
  • Gas-powered generation is projected to grow from 3.5 GW to over 8 GW in the next
    decade - around 13% annual growth.
  • Peak gas demand expected to rise from around 300 terajoules/day to over 1 petajoule/
    day in that timeframe.
  • As wind and solar continue to expand, the need for firming capacity will also grow; gas
    will provide that reliability when renewables can’t.
  • The southern gas market on the east coast faces challenges, creating additional demand
    for gas and infrastructure.
  • We’ll need significant pipeline and storage investment, supported by strong planning and
    coordination between industry and government.
  • Effective collaboration will be essential to ensure gas supports the system throughout
    the transition.
  • There has been strong engagement from Queensland Treasury and the Resources
    Minister in developing the Roadmap, and we look forward to continuing that engagement
    as we implement the plan and meet the state’s future energy needs.

What are the key investment risks you see in Queensland’s energy transition?




 

John Carr

  • As an investor, every risk is also an opportunity.
  • There are two relevant risks to discuss: targets and time.
  • Firstly, the target landscape for investment has shifted significantly over the past
    12 months.
  • These have previously focused on large state-owned pumped hydro, coal closures and
    rapid onshore wind and hydrogen rollout.
  • Those targets are now changing, presenting both risk and opportunity.
  • The pragmatic approach being taken in Queensland is positive, but this means we need
    to reposition investments accordingly.
  • For investors who have already committed capital, this change creates new risks that
    must be understood and managed.
  • Secondly, time is the most valuable resource - it’s incompressible.
  • You can add money or people, but you can’t add time.
  • Capital doesn’t wait - from raising to deployment to return, investments follow
    a fixed timeline.
  • Large infrastructure projects are particularly exposed to these time pressures, particularly
    as the changing target landscape requires reimagining what projects and investments
    look like.
  • With QIC joining to provide an investment lens to the transition, there’s a great
    opportunity, but also risk, as time keeps ticking on the transition imperative.
  • Additionally, the grid challenges we face are ongoing, and time remains the critical factor
    in addressing them.

In his Energy Roadmap speech, the Treasurer spoke about well-located fringe-of-grid and remote
generation playing an important role in Queensland’s energy future. Do you agree with this? What kind of benefits can such generation bring?




 

James Harman

  • The Queensland Government’s Energy Roadmap rightly focuses on diverse energy
    sources to guide us through the transition.
  • The National Electricity Market (NEM) is long, complex and highly volatile - the most
    volatile in the world.
  • Events in one part of the grid – such as a power station outage in Sydney - can impact
    supply and prices across multiple states, including Queensland.
  • As summer approaches, major generators coordinate closely with governments to keep
    the lights on - it’s a difficult and delicate balance.
  • Traditionally, power stations were built near major cities and coal sources. But now,
    industries and communities are expanding far from those traditional power hubs, creating
    transmission challenges.
  • Powerlink’s role (Jackie’s work) is to extend transmission to these regions, but we can ease that burden by producing energy closer to load - off-grid or at the fringe of the grid.
  • This approach reduces the need for long, costly transmission lines, providing reliable, cheaper and more sustainable power.
  • The Queensland Government’s focus on the North West Mineral Province is very welcome.
  • The region is rich in critical minerals and rare earths but lacks energy infrastructure.
  • Many junior mining companies want to develop projects that would create regional jobs and economic benefits, but power access is a barrier.
  • Power access could be achieved using modular, purpose-built hybrid power systems (solar, wind, battery, plus thermal backup).
  • This will help new industries emerge and existing diesel-reliant industries transition to more sustainable power.
  • EDL already operates hybrid renewable power stations supplying mines and communities in Western Australia, South Australia and the Northern Territory.
  • We aim to work hand-in-hand with the Queensland Government to unlock the potential of the North West Mineral Province and other remote regions.
  • We welcome the $200 million Northwest Energy Plan fund, designed to support fringe-of-grid and off-grid energy development.
  • Though details are still emerging, we’re confident of strong collaboration with the state government and QIC.

Are there any particular regulatory or legislative changes that could streamline our ability to accelerate the energy transition in Queensland?



Jacqui Bridge

  • Regulatory and legislative requirements for infrastructure are voluminous and complex -a core challenge for transmission developers.
  • We are a mostly regulated network and must navigate the regulatory framework to justify investment.
  • Almost every state has introduced alternative investment pathways (different to the National Electricity Rules), creating opportunities and risks and a more anticipatory view of transmission needs.
  • This diversifies and complicates the NEM, with different investment pathways across jurisdictions.
  • Any project faces a myriad of requirements: planning approvals, environmental approvals, technical standards and increasing engagement requirements, plus expanding codes and guidelines.
  • This means projects are taking longer to deliver than before.
  • Time is money - uncertainty from complex, multi-layered (federal, state, local) processes vary across states, creating timeline uncertainty.
  • We need to streamline because delivery timelines aren’t matching the urgency.
  • From a transmission perspective, Central Queensland-Gladstone is critical. The government will use the Queensland Priority Transmission Investment Framework to streamline legislative amendments and provide clear signals that help reduce uncertainty and accelerate delivery.

What role should governments play in supporting energy investment?




 

John Carr

  • Before answering, I’d like to pose a question: how much is a blackout worth?
    When and where is it worth the most?
  • If we can answer that, we can send a clear market signal - one of the first things
    investors need.
  • The Energy Roadmap, supported by Treasury modellers and Powerlink, has started to
    address this through economic modelling.
  • As we transition from coal and gas to variable renewables, we’ll inevitably face supply
    gaps when the sun isn’t shining, or the wind isn’t blowing.
  • The key question becomes: what’s the value of those ‘holes’ in the market?
  • Currently, no clear value is placed on them - if government can quantify and signal that
    value, investors can make informed decisions and price their returns accordingly.
  • The second element is co-investment.
  • I’m not referring to equity, but rather early-stage development investment, where
    government and private sector share risk.
  • To address this risk, it’s critical to work with Powerlink and the Office of the Coordinator-General (OCG). This is a measured, collaborative process and is essential for long-term success.
  • This is because some past projects rushed ahead without that coordination, and industry
    is now paying the price.
  • Early co-investment and coordination help de-risk development and should come with
    shared upside and downside - government should receive a return if successful and share
    the loss if not.
  • To this end, the Energy Roadmap and Renewable Investment Fund are strong signals
    that build investor confidence, demonstrating the government’s willingness to partner and support the transition.
  • The key will be for government to stay the course, as project timelines are often much
    longer than political cycles.

The Treasurer has welcomed private generation investment. Are there areas where that private
investment makes most sense? What actions can the Government take to encourage this investment
taking place?




 

James Harman

  • Policy certainty is critical to attract private investment into Queensland’s energy system.
  • The private sector brings capital and expertise - complementary to government-owned
    corporations - drawing on experience from across Australia and globally.
  • Queensland’s energy sector is heavily government-owned (generation, distribution,
    transmission), which limits areas where the private sector can participate.
  • For example - EDL has built, owned and operated hybrid renewable power stations
    (up to 75% renewable fraction) for remote industry and communities across Australia.
  • These are microgrids, far from the main grid where we’ve put our capital at risk and
    successfully operated for 15 years in some locations.
  • However, it is more difficult to do this for Queensland communities because that’s
    Ergon’s role.
  • We’re asking for the opportunity to compete - to tender alongside Ergon - so government
    can choose private capital and expertise to support remote regional opportunities, bringing our experience to benefit Queensland.

The LNG industry recently marked ten years of operating in Queensland. What regulatory changes
have occurred in your time at APLNG and what has this meant for commitments here in Queensland to supply gas for manufacturing and energy?





 

Dan Clark

  • For context, around 75% of east coast gas is exported, and the remaining 25% serves the
    domestic market.
  • Southern states have prohibited/restricted development, reducing local supply near
    demand centres and stressing the system.
  • International price spikes (e.g., Russia’s invasion of Ukraine) have flowed through to
    Australia, resulting in supply/price shocks which triggered significant, piecemeal market
    interventions. These have been focused on where uncontracted gas goes and how
    it’s priced.
  • These interventions and the threat of price controls have deterred investment,
    exacerbating supply decline and system pressure.
  • Another major unresolved issue has been domestic-market gas being bought for export,
    further tightening supply and raising prices.
  • To address this, the Federal Government has initiated a review of the gas regulatory
    framework which is currently underway.
  • While we don’t like interventions, it is clear that a major reset is needed. This could take
    the form of an export permit system, where, if you export, you must also contribute to the
    domestic market (deliver domestically first).
  • This would improve incentives and certainty for exporters and the broader market.
  • Ideally this would have been done upfront (before investment occurred), but rules have
    changed which has already impacted investments. However, there remains need for a
    reset to reduce risk to Australia’s gas supply and export contracts.

The Energy Roadmap in Queensland and Australian Energy Market Operator’s Integrated System Plan
indicate that we need a broad range of both generation and storage assets to ensure an ongoing, reliable and secure supply of electricity for customers. Are there any particular generation or storage technology types that we haven’t been focusing on which you think we should?




 

James Harman

  • The panel discussion so far highlights how critical regulation is - and how complex the
    transition is.
  • Other regions with less wind/solar have succeeded by using policy and regulatory settings that open opportunities for all technologies.
  • Europe strongly supports biogas (e.g., anaerobic digestion and landfill gas).
  • In the US, consistent regulations have supported renewable gas despite shifting administrations.
  • This has seen renewable gas - methane from landfill/waste - injected into pipelines. This is
    fungible with natural gas – it decarbonises industry and transport (nearly all US transport gas is renewable) and lets utilities offer renewable gas to households and commercial users.
  • EDL has invested about $1 billion in the US, building five renewable gas plants with around 7 PJ of capacity into the US pipeline network. This has been enabled by policy and regulatory certainty.
  • Australia isn’t there yet, but green shoots exist. Victoria, New South Wales and the
    Commonwealth Governments have signalled green gas targets/credits and broader renewable fuels support on the horizon.
  • We need regulatory certainty that doesn’t change, because we make 20–30-year bets on
    these investments.
  • Beyond batteries and pumped hydro to firm renewable generation, we can use waste gas from coal mines and landfill gas to generate power close to load under various schemes.
  • Additionally, hybrid renewables (solar/wind/battery + thermal backup) built close to load – such as in the North West Mineral Province – can serve local demand and relieve grid pressure, vital as data centres will increase demand on an already stretched grid.
  • This will require a mindset shift around how we can supplement large coal and gas with a full toolkit of technologies, so Queensland delivers sustainable, reliable and cost-effective power.

 In the organisations that you represent and the role that you play, what is the top priority issue that you’re currently focusing on?



Jacqui Bridge

  • From a transmission perspective, the Central Queensland reinforcement (Gladstone Project) is critical.
  • Gladstone is Queensland’s second-largest load centre, hosting major industry, jobs and economic activity.
  • We must ensure a safe, reliable, sustainable energy supply to the region - this project enables that.
  • Queensland is a land of abundance - our job is to leverage it to unlock sustainable energy supply.
  • There are many possible solutions to achieve this, and we must review assumptions and adapt to a new landscape to find the right ones to address the challenges we face.



 

James Harman

  • Our highest priority at EDL is our people and safety.
  • This is a constant challenge with 80 power stations across five countries, many in remote locations.
  • Safety is our number one focus and something that keeps the leadership team awake at night.
  • Additionally, our biggest challenge is continuing to innovate as markets evolve.
  • Over 40 years, EDL has grown from an innovative entrepreneurial startup (founded by two
    people) to a global company of over 600 people.
  • We now operate across five countries - including major investments in the US, UK and Canada.
  • We sell 10 different products in 16 markets worldwide - Queensland is just one of them.
  • The question is how to keep innovating to stay ahead (or at least on par) with the competition in every market.
  • Managing this global spread and innovation pressure is a constant focus for the executive team.



 

John Carr

  • If the Queensland Energy Roadmap is the ‘what’, then how we deliver it is key.
  • This involves working with QIC and the Queensland Government to ensure:
    • the right technologies types are evaluated properly, both economically and commercially;
    • we maintain social and environmental licenses responsibly, while staying commercially viable;
    • projects are deployed efficiently and on time; and
    • effective collaboration with GOCs, OCG and Powerlink – who are essential partners in
      Queensland’s energy system.




 

Dan Clark

  • Safety is a top priority - we operate 3,000 wells, which includes compression horsepower,
    pipelines and a major hazard LNG facility.
  • Ensuring our people are protected and our product stays in the pipe is our core value.
  • From a business perspective, the focus is on the gas market review and securing the right policy settings – which is essential to place the market on a sustainable growth trajectory.
  •  Currently, we’re not on a sustainable path, so correcting that is a top priority.
 

AUDIENCE QUESTIONS

With all of these new projects coming online, how do we safeguard our climate goals? How do we make sure that we are meeting emissions targets while also protecting land, water and community?
 




 

Dan Clark

  • Providing energy requires balancing affordability, reliability and sustainability - it’s always a trade-off.
  • As a gas producer, we continually look for ways to reduce our environmental footprint.
  • We must also be responsive to market demand – by understanding what customers want
    and what they’re willing to pay for.
  • Everyone wants lower emissions, but their willingness to pay varies, creating an ongoing
    challenge in the transition.
  • Ultimately, it’s about responsible operation - ensuring gas projects are developed while doing everything possible to support emissions reduction.

Do you feel like you have the volume of people that you need - with the right skills and in the right place - for the energy transition that’s in front of you?




 

James Harman

  • We don’t have enough people - or always the right skills for what’s needed in the energy
    transition. The demand for new skills is a constant challenge.
  • As such, we’re making a conscious effort to train and retrain our workforce for evolving roles.
  • We have an aging workforce - many with 20-35 years’ experience - who are now
    approaching retirement.
  • We’re focused on bringing through younger talent via our apprenticeship program,
    which helps secure future capability.
  • There’s also a strong focus on gender diversity – for example, most apprentices are women.
  • This helps correct gender imbalance across the organisation.



Jacqui Bridge

  • We face the same workforce challenges.
  • Powerlink depends on a highly skilled workforce to deliver projects, supported by
    specialist contractors.
  • This challenge ties back to the issue of certainty - knowing what we need to deliver
    and when helps us plan and size our workforce effectively.
  • We’re actively building our workforce across multiple domains through an annual intake of development engineers, apprenticeship programs and specialised training (e.g., linework and technical skills).
  • Our goal is to have the right-sized workforce for the next wave of development, which will exceed past activity.
  • Certainty about upcoming projects (5-10 years) is key to rightsizing and preparing the workforce for what’s ahead.



 

John Carr

  • Adding to that - in the front-end development space, workforce challenges are
    especially significant.
  • Many projects compete for the same talent, but with different certainty of timelines.
  • Uncertainty makes it hard to retain skilled teams, as people move to other projects in
    Australia or overseas that are more advanced or secure.
  • This is a consistent challenge in project development, particularly in Queensland,
    where there are many alternative opportunities for skilled professionals.



Jacqui Bridge

  • One positive development is that young people are increasingly interested in energy.
  • With strong media coverage, there’s growing curiosity about the energy transition and
    emerging technologies.
  • For example, this year, we received over 1,000 applications for around 30 apprenticeship roles.
  • I’m often approached by friends and colleagues whose children want to learn about engineering or other areas of the energy supply chain.
  • This growing enthusiasm is a very positive sign for the future of the sector.

With cost of living the top political priority and energy influencing every part of the economy, is there enough competition - in technologies or among market players - to keep power prices stable in the long term?




 

James Harman

  • While there may be enough competition, the energy transition is inherently expensive.
  • That reality has been lost in public discussion over the past decade.
  • There’s an unavoidable cost to this transition - whether paid by government or consumers,
    the burden ultimately falls on households through other measures.
  • Energy will get cheaper eventually, but not yet - the required infrastructure build-out will take years.
  • It’s an unfortunate misconception that power bills would fall quickly; cheaper energy is still
    several years away.
  • This is a global reality, not unique to Australia.
  • Ultimately, the higher near-term costs are the price of tackling climate change and reducing its long-term impacts, even amid cost-of-living pressures.
How can industry and government-owned corporations ensure regulatory certainty despite frequent
political changes?



 

John Carr

  • Energy benefits everyone, yet in the past 12 months we’ve seen it be subjected to political shifts.
  • Some aspects of energy policy should be apolitical, though that’s an inconvenient truth.
  • When major policy or direction changes occur, politicians should aim for common ground - providing certainty that investments made today will remain stable over future election cycles.
  • The energy transition is difficult but worthwhile, even though bearing the cost is challenging.
  • We must consider: is it better for us to bear the cost now, or pass it to future generations?
  • The focus should be on regulatory certainty, ensuring long-term policy stability and leaving political debate for less fundamental issues.

 FULL EVENT REPLAY: